I flicked
on the television early this morning and was caught in front of the screen by
an interview Peter Williams was having with John Walker. That’s the Great John Walker, gold medalist
for the 1500 metres and first New
Zealander to break the 3 minute 50 second barrier.
I enjoyed
the interview, always do when one of the great runners of that generation is
interviewed, due to the fact it was in my era of excitement in watching the
races and then beginning to run myself.
During the
interview there were shots of Walker winning his gold medal at the Montreal
Olympic Games, shots which were televised around the world at the time; and more shots of his breaking the 3 minute 50
barrier in Sweden, also televised worldwide.
This is the most famous photograph of that moment.
After this
particular news segment a separate news clip was of some fine bodied New
Zealand men performing the haka at a World War One grave site in Turkey. The camera spanned a few of the graves and I
noted something that had me reflect on the shots of Walker crossing the finish
line for all the world to see.
Can you see
what I am referring to?
Tony used
to often say, “Everyone has a snozzle.” I always thought the word ‘snozzle’ was
a Cockney word for ‘nose’. It is, but
when he quoted it he referred to a person having a ‘hang up’. Or obsession.
Or phobia. Or botheration.
Well, of
late I have read, heard and overheard so many ‘snozzles’ among our general
populace. And the most discussed and
popular snozzle at the moment is the jolly New Zealand flag debate.
It has been
amusing. Entertaining. Intriguing.
Funny. Often droll. And often preposterous.
It is fair
to say that so many of any general population loathe change. It is a botheration for them. The flag debate has certainly proven to
be yet another challenge for some to contemplate accepting a change on our
national ensign.
Bemusement
has come to me by reading some of the many Facebook posting friends have put up
– friends on both sides of the change argument.
Some firmly, even fiercely anti any change to the present flag, others
just as dogged to have change.
Me? I do have a view but never considered the
flag change a big enough issue to become whelmed up with emotion about. I can think of so many more issues to become passionate
about that surround us near and far.
Therefore I
have thoroughly enjoyed sitting on the fence with this issue and have watch the
ensuing fuss whilst at the same time acknowledging that there are times when
accepting change is an inevitability in life. Some people loathe any change. But, change happens. Thankfully,
otherwise we would never have been inspired to develop the invention of the
wheel. Nor would we have ever had sliced
bread.
The flag debate certainly is a debate of change.
One can
fight change, or one can embrace change, or one can accept change irrespective
of how feistily you have fought against it.
What is more relevant is what the change is that you become emotional, passionate and feisty about.
So my fence
sitting on this issue has given me much amusement and entertainment by watching it being played out over the past couple of years.
Now, back
to my earlier reference to John Walker and the Gallipoli graves.
What caused me to stop and pause and ponder
on the relationship these two televised news articles had in common - these two major historical events in our
country’s past - was the New Zealand flag.
The first news article was about one of our greatest athletes
and the other article was of the first great world war where we lost over 18,000 New
Zealand soldiers. The first historical
news article dates back to 1977, the other back to 1914 to 1918. Both these historic articles have been pictorially represented and linked by, not the present national flag, not the Southern Cross, not the Union Jack,
but by the silver fern.
There it is, for all to have seen since 1914.
To me it
stated much but I realise it would mean sweet all to many of those who are
vehemently opposed to any flag change.
It reminded
me of Tony’s and my Europe travels in 2010 when we went to follow the Tour de
France, in France. We had packed away in
our little bags a good sized New Zealand flag which we had purposely purchased
at the New Zealand shop adjacent to the New Zealand Embassy in Central
London. We were going to France to watch
the tour and in among the many teams were three Kiwi cyclists so we wanted to
make sure everyone around us knew that we were Kiwis, there to support and
cheer along our fellow countrymen.
Each day we
carried the flag. Each day we would then
spread it across the hills and fields in the hope that the helicopters above
who were sending televised coverage all around the world would show the flag
well displayed. Each day some French, or
German, or Belgium family would nod at us and explain to their children that we
were from Australia. Whenever we could
we would try to correct them and endeavour to explain we were not Australian
but we were New Zealanders; New Zealand being a different country to
Australia. Each time we realised the
language barrier meant we were not understood so though we were shaking our
heads and pointing to the flag and saying “New Zealand,” it meant nothing to
these many families and they wandered off in the knowledge that those
Australian people they had just met were quite odd.
During that
same holiday trip I also had taped to my backpack a lovely embroidered tiki,
given to me by a dear friend for the purpose of being seen by fellow travellers,
particularly fellow Kiwi travelers, who would then acknowledge us as
Kiwis. Not once in ten months did anyone
pick this up – and this was during times when we were surrounded by touring New
Zealanders. So the tiki did not strike
any note with anyone.
After the
third day of our displaying our country’s flag and receiving no recognition by
the tens of thousands who also travelled the course of le Tour with us, we
packed away the flag, where it remained and is now a torn piece of shredded
flag that has adorned our old clothes line in the back yard for the past five
years.
On our last
day of travelling with le Tour, Tony put on an Ironman t shirt that had the
silver fern somewhere amidst the many Ironman logos. We were in a tiny village in France, sitting
having an espresso on a rock wall by the roadside when a giant tour bus came
slowly driving past, maneuvering through the narrow village streets. As the bus came alongside us two sitting on
the wall, the driver stopped adjacent, pulled back his sliding window, stuck
his head out of the window, gave us the broadest smile we had seen all day and
called out in some funny European accent, “Kiwi! Kiwi! All black!” Then to us two stunned ones
thumped his chest and then pointed to Tony’s chest where there was the small
6cm silver fern embroidered.
The driver
then turned around to his audience in the bus and yelled to them in French, or
German, or Italian, or whatever … whilst
pointing to Tony, “All black. Kiwi. All black!”
All windows on the bus had faces pushed up hard against the panes,
peering at Tony, the Kiwi, the all black, and they all waved and cheered at
that Kiwi sitting on the wall. One
presumes they all believed their trusty bus driver and thought that Tony must
have been an All Black.
We were
left highly amused as the driver then proceeded onward in his maneuvering his
bus through the village streets, with back seat passengers turning to wave at
us and they disappeared into the distance.
A small,
two inch silver fern. We had been
carrying a one and a half metre by three metre flag all throughout France and
no one knew it was from New Zealand. But
this whole bus knew by the two inch silver fern that we were Kiwis.
I was at a
dinner party earlier this year when a fellow diner, who loves ruffling feathers,
tried to engage all the dinner party guests in some heated debate about the “debacle
John Key is making over changing the flag.”
I stayed smut for the initial part, taking a general interest in who sat
on which side of the debate on the issue and realised that the discussion had
changed tact from the flag to the politics and policies of the present
government in being instrumental in making such a major and critical change in
our history. Their words, not mine. As their discussion was about to finish and
turn to something even more pressing, like pony tail pulling, I thought some
balance should be put into the debate.
I reminded
my audience that if they reflect back to our previous government who held onto
governing from 1999 to 2008, that their leader, Helen Clark, was a strong
proponent of having New Zealand become a republic. There was dead silence. Did my audience, I asked, think that should
the Labour party have made us a republic in that period, that our flag would
remain the same? The flag with the Union
Jack?
I
continued, if you remember, Helen Clark was quoted as saying that our flag at
that time “… exclusively acknowledges our British heritage and totally ignores
our Maori heritage.” Remember that
Helen Clark has stated many times that it is “… inevitable that New Zealand
becomes a republic and that would reflect the reality that New Zealand is a
totally sovereign independent 21st century nation 12,000 miles from
the United Kingdom.” Does this sound like someone who would retain the Union
Jack in our ‘totally independent nation’?
Remember,
this is also the governing party that abolished the Privy Council option for
New Zealanders. And the same governing
party abolished knighthood and damehoods as well as abolishing the title of ‘Queen’s
Council’.
I kinda
took the steam out of their bubbling indignation of the ‘John Key government
wanting to mess with our flag history’.
I am
neither right, nor left, nor centre-left, nor centre-right. I just remembered history. It was only 7 years ago. Funny how people forget, for convenience.
BTW, I’m
not a communist either.
But I like
facts.
I did not
mention it at the time, as I felt I’d popped one too many festering bubbles,
but I also remember the Right Honorable Matiu Rata, MP for Labour, Maori MP,
also called for a flag change. This goes
back to 1992. Due to his view on this a
member’s bill was introduced for a government committee to be formed to take us
into a referendum about a new flag.
Funny
that. This government has done the same.
So, seems
the present Labour opposition has become miffed and conveniently forgotten
their own history when it comes to the flag debate and their peels and calls
some months ago about it being a National Party policy they were against. Notice now how they have come to accede to
the concept. Seems National took their
policy and made it their own and are now getting flak from the very members of
the political party that actually initiated flag change.
I hear the
lovely representatives from the many RSAs within the country making their own
representations against flag change. I
hear them saying so often how our men fought under the flag, died under the
flag and defended us from the world’s evils under the flag.
Did
they? I have read so many history books
on the two major world wars. Heart
breaking books. Stories of men who died,
men who returned. Letters from men to
their wives and families. I have stopped
reading those books. They are too heart
breaking to read. But I cannot recall
one book quoting one soldier who says he was fighting for the flag. I can recall many quotes of the pride of
fighting alongside fellow Kiwi soldiers.
Pride of the fighting forces among our Maori Battalion.
Yes, the
New Zealand flag was the same as we have now, but do you really think that
Uncle Ted who went to fight in the Second World War went to fight for the
flag? No, he went to ‘do his bit’, for ‘God, for King and for country’. Not the flag.
I have
photos of Maori Battalion medals.
Below. What is it that stands out
so strongly in the middle of these medals?
The one with the silver fern.
If only we
could bring back to life all the soldiers we lost to those wars and ask them
what symbol most represented what they fought for.
Quite interesting
how every overseas grave of our soldiers has the silver fern on it. Not the Union Jack, or koru for that matter. And every war gravestone in New Zealand has
the silver fern on it.
As for ‘God,
King and country’. Well, God I
accept. Country I accept. But King?
The country the King, now Queen, lives in was the same country that left
New Zealand a little in the financial poo some many years ago with their
joining the European Economic Community.
Poor New Zealand was left a little out of the trade bargaining after
that. Was not a lot of loyalty to the century and a half of New Zealand's British patriotism shown to us then - when they were looking at what side of the bread would be best buttered for them, we were left flailing.
Undoubtedly one of the best things that happened to this little Commonwealth country. Indeed, it was from then on that little old New Zealand learnt it
was a fairly smart little dominion and began to find avenues of income
in many other forms, successfully, since losing the reliance on Britain buying the major production
of our dairy and meat produce.
Speaking of
meat, interesting that some of our sports people consider the silver fern as
the symbol of New Zealand they most relate to.
Mahe Drysdale came into that debate, stating his views on this being our
chance to make the silver fern our symbol.
This week the other New Zealand rower, Eric Bond, made similar comments about his positive view of us having a new flag for them to fly when they take podium places at the World Rowing Championships. Love his great optimism.
This is a great shot of our four gold medalists from the last Olympics - something silver and fern-like stands out.
And interestingly our Commonwealth and Olympic medalist, Beatrice, happens to be on the flag changing panel.
When I had
my little tour business it always gave me pleasure to take tourists along bush
walks and come across a silver fern tree, stopped them and turn the leaf over
and explain to them the meaning of our world recognised fern. There were many
an American travelling home with a silver fern leaf tucked in among the pages
of a book or luggage. It always had them
consider it a ‘charming’ emblem.
I mentioned
the koru earlier. I note many of the
final flag samples the government has now whittled the selection down to has the
koru symbol emblazoned. I love the koru. I have koru badges, necklaces, broaches, and
even bracelet trinkets of korus. It
means much to me. It means new life,
growth, harmony and new beginnings.
Guess that what flag changing represents too, new beginnings. However, would there be anyone overseas who
would have the slightest idea what the koru is?
What it means? I read an article
in today’s newspaper where an American tabloid has described it as a “curly
thing”.
As much as
I love the koru – I remind myself, what is it really? It is the new shoot of … a silver fern.
What would bother me most if the Koru were accepted, is that Air New Zealand would be in marketing heaven. Indeed, they could halve their marketing team as the New Zealand flag would be the company's greatest marketing tool and emblem. Now that I ponder on this I realise it should not bother me as Air NZ is majorly NZ owned; maybe the Koru on the flag would be a good thing!
I spent
five months of 2014 travelling around the United Kingdom and Italy. No one, anywhere came up to me, or my sister
and I, and asked where we were from. We
were obvious tourists, yet no one bothered to engage us in conversation. Wherever I went I took my
swimming gear, which included my black swim suit with the big silver fern
across the front and back. I went
swimming in a pool in Central London in this suit, and a man came up and asked
if I was a Kiwi. He recognised the silver fern.
We had a long chat about whatever, it was an enjoyable encounter. I went swimming in another indoor pool in
Wales and a young couple came up to me after recognizing the silver fern and
told me they spent time in New Zealand in 2008.
Two delightful conversations occurred simply because of the silver fern,
the recognizable silver fern.
When Tony
and I were in Toulouse in 2010 we went to a little suburban café and there on
the wall were a row of international rugby jerseys, with the All Black one
proudly displayed at the top. When the
waiter came to take our order we pointed to the jersey and said we were from
New Zealand and showed him the silver fern broach I was wearing. We got free wine that night, because he was
the proprietor and the All Blacks were his heros. We were countrymen of the All Blacks who
carry the silver fern wherever they go, therefore the wine was on him.
So, six
pages later you can figure my view on the flag and flag change.
I note the
many antagonists on talk back radio who are angry about any flag change are
either from the RSA or have a slight tinge of a UK accent. Or are totally, totally against the change due to their life-long loyalty to any New Zealand political party other than National. Or is that just my imagination? But, as has often happened, when the talk
back presenter presses, they confess to either being died-in-the-wool anti-National, or having some UK family history.
Because I am neither blue, nor red, nor green, or whatever other colour the politics of our country are I find it hard to be anti-something due solely to a particular political party pressing for it.
In my mind
I will presume those are the same people that are heard saying when new
immigrants come to this country they should ‘integrate’. That they are in their new country now and
should feel grateful for being here, so therefore should leave their past
behind and begin anew in this new country and adopt our customs. Funny how many old school or UK folk don’t want to let go
of the Union Jack.
Yes, the
flag does represent history. And we all
learn from history. Fortunately it is
impossible to live in history. But
history is something tangible to learn from.
We cannot move forward into the future without looking back to the
past. If you prefer to live in the past,
and the flag debate is your ‘snozzle’ good for you. May the Union Jack stay for you.
The flag is
not a pressing issue really. Not in the
realm of other happenings in our world.
But, like
it or not, National Party or Labour Party, the flag is going to change. The question is merely when.